TommyRobinson has lost a Court of Appeal challenge against his 18-month sentence for contempt of court.
Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, was jailed last October for the civil offence of contempt of court, and challenged the length of the sentence at the Court of Appeal on Friday.
The 42-year-old was jailed after admitting 10 breaches of a High Court order made in 2021, which barred him from repeating false allegations against a Syrian refugee who successfully sued him for libel.
The Solicitor General opposed Robinson’s appeal, with its barristers stating there are “no grounds for altering the sentence”.
In a ruling on Wednesday, Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr, Lord Justice Edis and Lord Justice Warby dismissed the appeal.
“The judge’s application of the law and his reasoning on the appropriate sanction in this case both exhibit a meticulous approach,” they said.
The decision marksRobinson’ssecond court defeat in less than a month, after a bid to bring a legal challenge against the Government over his segregation at HMP Woodhill in Milton Keynes was thrown out of the High Court in March.
He was jailed at Woolwich Crown Court after admitting 10 breaches of the injunction, with the Solicitor General having earlier issued two contempt claims against him last year.
The first alleged he “knowingly” breached the order on four occasions, including by having “published, caused, authorised or procured” a film called Silenced, which contains the libellous allegations, in May 2023.
The film was pinned to the top ofRobinson’sprofile on the social media site X, while he also repeated the claims in three interviews between February and June 2023.
The second claim was issued in August concerning six further breaches, including playing the film at a demonstration in Trafalgar Square in central London last summer.
Handing down the sentence in October, Mr Justice Johnson said “nobody is above the law”, and describedRobinson’sbreaches of the injunction as “flagrant”.
The judge saidRobinsoncould reduce his sentence by four months if he took certain steps to “purge” his contempt, such as removing the film from his social media pages.
At the Court of Appeal, Alisdair Williamson KC, forRobinson, said he has ADHD and “complex post-traumatic stress disorder”, which the sentencing judge was not fully aware of.
He said: “[Mr Justice Johnson] did not have before him this additional factor, which in of itself means that the conditions that Mr Yaxley-Lennon faces are more onerous.”
He continued: “He is being kept safe by the authorities in segregation, but being kept safe is making him ill, and more ill than Mr Justice Johnson could have foreseen on the basis of the information before him.”
Aidan Eardley KC, for the Solicitor General, said in written submissions there is “no evidence that the conditions in which the appellant is being held are more severe than was anticipated” by Mr Justice Johnson.
He said: “Legally, there is no basis for arguing that conditions unforeseeably imposed by the prison authorities could found a ground of appeal.”
He continued: “There are no grounds for altering the sentence in this case.”
The injunction was issued afterRobinsonwas successfully sued by Jamal Hijazi, a then-schoolboy who was assaulted at Almondbury Community School in Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, in October 2018.
After a clip of the incident went viral,Robinsonmade false claims on Facebook, including about Mr Hijazi attacking girls in his school, leading to the libel case.
Mr Justice Nicklin orderedRobinsonto pay Mr Hijazi £100,000 in damages and his legal costs, as well as making the injunction preventingRobinsonfrom repeating the allegations.
